Anna Adams is a national-level expert in public, health and regulatory law. She has over twenty-five years’ experience in advisory work and litigation that has ranged from large-scale public cases through to small, personal matters.
Additional credentials
Anna Adams is a national-level expert in public, health and regulatory law. She has over twenty-five years’ experience in advisory work and litigation that has ranged from large-scale public cases through to small, personal matters.
Anna’s experience includes public, administrative and local government law (particularly Auckland’s legislation and infrastructure), judicial review, medico-legal proceedings and health law, coroners’ inquiries, human rights and vulnerable persons’ law, education law, privacy and information law including online safety issues. She has a particular skill in medical evidence and healthcare-related matters including concerns arising from patient, practitioner and hospital, professional discipline, medicines, mental health and capacity, and the treatment environment.
Anna has extensively advised on public policy and regulatory systems, governance, probity and anti-corruption issues in large organisations. She has conducted large-scale reviews, legislative and regulatory reform processes, and served as a board member of the New Zealand Civil Aviation Authority and the Auckland Medico-Legal Society governing committee.
Anna is a seasoned litigator in civil matters and prosecutions. She has appeared as lead counsel in well over a hundred civil and criminal cases before the District Court, High Court and Court of Appeal as well as in coronial inquests, watchdog inquiries and a range of tribunals.
Anna is a strategic thinker, skilled in constructive problem-solving that serves clients’ needs and values. She is comfortable engaging with private clients, public officials, experts and international parties with interests in New Zealand.
Before joining Bankside Chambers Anna was a partner at law firm Meredith Connell for over fifteen years, including chair of the firm’s board for four years, and a Crown prosecutor. Prior to this Anna conducted commercial litigation in federal and state court in New York and was a Judge’s Clerk at the New Zealand Court of Appeal.
Anna is a member of the New Zealand and the New York Bars and a graduate of Yale Law School and the University of Auckland, where she was the recipient of prizes in law and politics. She is an associate member of the New Zealand Institute of Directors.
Public law and judicial review
Counsel in judicial reviews – for example:
Mt Wellington Race Park v Auckland Council, Auckland Transport & Independent Traffic Control Ltd (HC 2020) – decided local government obligations when changing use of park land and commercial land
Urban Auckland v Auckland Council & Ports of Auckland Ltd (HC 2015) – reviewed legality of council’s decision to consent the Auckland Port to extend Bledisloe Wharf into the Waitemata Harbour
Medico-legal and health law matters
Counsel in health law matters before the Court of Appeal, High Court, District Court, tribunals and regulatory bodies – for example:
Gill v Attorney-General (Ministry of Health) (HC - CA 2009–2011) – leading case on seizure of doctor-patient information in criminal investigation
B, C, A, RL, AN, L v Auckland, Counties Manukau District Health Boards (HC - CA 2010–2017) – patients contesting mental health decision-making and compulsory treatment
Auckland District Health Board v Z, E, W (HC 2011-2013) – hospital applications for children needing urgent health care to be placed in the guardianship of the High Court
Director of Proceedings v Wilson (Human Rights Review Tribunal 2008) – action against doctor for breach of health and disability services code, performed vasectomy that resulted in unwanted pregnancy
Ryan v Auckland District Health Board (HC 2008) – negligence suit for transmission of disease through surgical instruments alleged
Representation of health professionals and regulatory bodies including psychologists, doctors, nurses, dentists in professional disciplinary processes
Protection of Personal Property Rights Act welfare orders obtained including contraceptive treatment of disabled person to preserve her health and well-being, care arrangements for elderly persons with capacity and psychiatric concerns
Reviews and inquiries of public decision-making
Counsel in major reviews of decision-making in public-facing bodies including probity, conflict of interest, legislative compliance, government performance issues – for example:
Acted for Auckland Mayor in Mike Bush review of Auckland’s 2023 flood response
Advised NZTA in 2019-2021 review of imported light vehicle compliance
Advised Auckland Council 2012 inquiry into Westgate town centre development
Inquests
Counsel in coronial inquiries and inquests into deaths of adults, adolescents and children – for example:
Accident (building site, cinema)
Suicide (employment bullying, mental health inpatients on leave, outpatients with psychiatric medication issues)
During medical treatment (misdiagnosis, medical overdoses, intensive care entry and treatment)
Inflicted injury (the Kahui twins after murder acquittal)
Complex civil and prosecutorial advocacy
Counsel in over a hundred prosecutions and civil litigations including public, regulatory, tort and criminal law in Court of Appeal, High Court, District Court and tribunals – for example:
Senior Crown prosecutor in jury trials of violent drugs, sexual, property and regulatory offending
R v Kumar (HC, CA 2013) – acting for hospital in leading case deciding disclosure of mental health records of sexual violation complainant in prosecution
X v AG & Auckland District Health Board – HC litigation 2017-2021 by former lawyer for breach of Bill of Rights in connection with health treatment and Police arrests
Ellis v Counties Manukau District Health Board (HC 2007) – negligence suit by mental health patient who killed his father while legally insane
Competing Conceptions of the Constitution: The New Zealand Bill of Rights Act 1990 in the Cooke Court of Appeal [1996] New Zealand Law Review 368-401